Media Summary: Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 62 banners I wanted to see if this counter would work against a 5-star Executor, and if the Executor being a lot slower would affect it. It turns ... [TW] Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 19 banners

Finalizer Silencer Fosftf Echelon Vs - Detailed Analysis & Overview

Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 62 banners I wanted to see if this counter would work against a 5-star Executor, and if the Executor being a lot slower would affect it. It turns ... [TW] Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 19 banners This battle is more prone to RNG against R7+ IG-2000s (if you fail to land a crit on a high-relic IG, it may survive the opening), but ... Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon starting) vs. triple-attacker Raddus: 69 banners I think Hunted does more damage than calling

Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor (XB, RC, IG-2000): 60 banners [TW] Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon) vs. triple-attacker Executor (R5 IG-2000): 18 banners Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon starting) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 59 banners [TW] Finalizer (Silencer, Shuttle, Echelon) vs. tanky Executor (HT, RC, XB): 22 banners His IG-88 was R5. At higher relics (R7+) there is a risk that you won't be able to kill IG-2000 on the opening sequence, which will ...

Photo Gallery

Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 62 banners
Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. 5-star triple-attacker Executor: harder than 7-star Exec
Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon) fails vs. triple-attacker Executor (R7 IG-2000): IG survives
[TW] Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 19 banners
Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor (IG-200, XB, RC): 65 banners
[TW] Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor (IG, RC, XB): 19 banners
Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon starting) vs. triple-attacker Raddus: 69 banners
[Fleet] Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon) vs. triple-attacker Executor (R5 pilots): 62 banners
Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor (XB, RC, IG-2000): 60 banners
[TW] Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon) vs. triple-attacker Executor (R5 IG-2000): 18 banners
Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon starting) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 59 banners
[TW] Finalizer (Silencer, Shuttle, Echelon) vs. tanky Executor (HT, RC, XB): 22 banners
View Detailed Profile
Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 62 banners

Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 62 banners

Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 62 banners

Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. 5-star triple-attacker Executor: harder than 7-star Exec

Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. 5-star triple-attacker Executor: harder than 7-star Exec

I wanted to see if this counter would work against a 5-star Executor, and if the Executor being a lot slower would affect it. It turns ...

Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon) fails vs. triple-attacker Executor (R7 IG-2000): IG survives

Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon) fails vs. triple-attacker Executor (R7 IG-2000): IG survives

With an R7

[TW] Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 19 banners

[TW] Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 19 banners

[TW] Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 19 banners

Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor (IG-200, XB, RC): 65 banners

Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor (IG-200, XB, RC): 65 banners

Winning

[TW] Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor (IG, RC, XB): 19 banners

[TW] Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor (IG, RC, XB): 19 banners

This battle is more prone to RNG against R7+ IG-2000s (if you fail to land a crit on a high-relic IG, it may survive the opening), but ...

Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon starting) vs. triple-attacker Raddus: 69 banners

Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon starting) vs. triple-attacker Raddus: 69 banners

Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon starting) vs. triple-attacker Raddus: 69 banners

[Fleet] Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon) vs. triple-attacker Executor (R5 pilots): 62 banners

[Fleet] Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon) vs. triple-attacker Executor (R5 pilots): 62 banners

I think Hunted does more damage than calling

Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor (XB, RC, IG-2000): 60 banners

Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor (XB, RC, IG-2000): 60 banners

Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor (XB, RC, IG-2000): 60 banners

[TW] Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon) vs. triple-attacker Executor (R5 IG-2000): 18 banners

[TW] Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon) vs. triple-attacker Executor (R5 IG-2000): 18 banners

[TW] Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon) vs. triple-attacker Executor (R5 IG-2000): 18 banners

Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon starting) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 59 banners

Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon starting) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 59 banners

Finalizer (Silencer, FOSFTF, Echelon starting) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 59 banners

[TW] Finalizer (Silencer, Shuttle, Echelon) vs. tanky Executor (HT, RC, XB): 22 banners

[TW] Finalizer (Silencer, Shuttle, Echelon) vs. tanky Executor (HT, RC, XB): 22 banners

[TW] Finalizer (Silencer, Shuttle, Echelon) vs. tanky Executor (HT, RC, XB): 22 banners

Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor (RC, XB, IG-2000): 65 banners

Finalizer (Echelon, Silencer, FOSFTF) vs. triple-attacker Executor (RC, XB, IG-2000): 65 banners

His IG-88 was R5. At higher relics (R7+) there is a risk that you won't be able to kill IG-2000 on the opening sequence, which will ...